Skip to content

Advertisement

EPJ Quantum Technology
EPJ Quantum Technology Cover Image
  • Research
  • Open Access

JOKARUS - design of a compact optical iodine frequency reference for a sounding rocket mission

  • †1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • †1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 2, 3,
  • 4,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 5,
  • 1 and
  • 1, 5
†Contributed equally
EPJ Quantum Technology20174:9

https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-017-0063-y

©  The Author(s) 2017

  • Received: 28 February 2017
  • Accepted: 9 May 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

We present the design of a compact absolute optical frequency reference for space applications based on hyperfine transitions in molecular iodine with a targeted fractional frequency instability of better than 3 × 10−14 after 1 s. It is based on a micro-integrated extended cavity diode laser with integrated optical amplifier, fiber pigtailed second harmonic generation wave-guide modules, and a quasi-monolithic spectroscopy setup with operating electronics. The instrument described here is scheduled for launch end of 2017 aboard the TEXUS 54 sounding rocket as an important qualification step towards space application of iodine frequency references and related technologies. The payload will operate autonomously and its optical frequency will be compared to an optical frequency comb during its space flight.

1 Sounding rockets as steppingstone for space-borne laser systems

Frequency stable laser systems are a mandatory key technology for future space missions using optical and quantum-optical technologies aiming at Earth observation, tests of fundamental physics and gravitational wave detection. Proposed and projected space missions like STE-QUEST [1], CAL [2, 3], QWEP [4], Q-TEST [5] aim at the observation of Bose-Einstein condensates at unprecedented expansion times, quantum gas physics in the pico Kelvin regime, and dual-species atom interferometry for future precision tests of the equivalence principle with quantum matter [1–3, 6]. Such experiments involving light-atom interaction, e.g., for laser cooling or atom interferometry, require laser systems whose optical frequency is stabilized to specific atomic transitions. Moreover, precise frequency control with high demands on frequency stability and agility as well as intensity control is mandatory. Planned gravitational wave observatories, such as LISA [7], use inter-satellite laser ranging with laser systems at 1,064 nm for detection of gravitational waves in a spectral window between 0.1 mHz and 1 Hz. Next generation gravity missions (NGGM) might use similar laser ranging techniques for global mapping of temporal variations of Earth’s gravitational field [8]. The requirement on laser frequency noise of these missions can be achieved by laser frequency stabilization to optical cavities or atomic or molecular transitions. Related technologies have been or are currently being developed in the context of missions aiming at space-borne atom interferometry [9–14] or atomic clocks [1, 15, 16].

In addition to the qualification in environmental testing facilities, the deployment of laser systems in realistic scenarios and relevant environments, offered by sounding rockets or zero-g parabolic flights, allows for rapid iterative tests and further development of related technologies. Sounding rocket mission in particular close the gap between ground and space applications [10, 11] but also enable scientific, pioneering pathfinder experiments as shown with recent MAIUS mission, demonstrating the first realization of a Bose-Einstein condensate of 87Rb in space. Sounding rocket missions based on VSB 30 motors, that are used in the TEXUS program, allow for a 16 min ballistic flight reaching an apogee of about 250 km after 4.2 min ascent, followed by about 6 min of μg time [17]. Typically, four experiment modules can be launched altogether on one mission as independent payloads, each with a diameter of 43.8 cm that can be covered in a pressurized dome. The total scientific payload mass is usually limited to 260 kg, with a total payload length of 3.4 m.

In the JOKARUS mission, we aim to demonstrate an absolute optical frequency reference at 1,064 nm on a sounding rocket. The JOKARUS laser system is based on modulation transfer spectroscopy of the hyperfine transition R(56)32-0:a10 in molecular iodine at 532 nm, using a frequency-doubled extended cavity diode laser (ECDL). Iodine frequency standards realized with frequency doubled Nd:YAG lasers locked to this hyperfine transition have been investigated in detail for many years as optical frequency standards [18, 19]. Thanks to the strong absorption and narrow natural linewidth of 220 kHz [20] these systems exhibit fractional frequency instabilities as low as 3 × 10−15 [9] and an absolute frequency reproducibility of few kHz [21]. These features make them promising candidates for future space missions targeting at the detection of gravitational waves, such as LISA, or monitoring of Earth’s gravitational potential, such as NGGM [8], which rely on laser-interferometric ranging with frequency-stable laser systems at 1,064 nm distributed on remote satellites that need to be precisely synchronized. Different realizations of iodine references for space missions were proposed and investigated on a breadboard level [22, 23] and prototypes were built that fulfill the requirements on the frequency stability for such missions [9, 24, 25]. The JOKARUS mission will, for the first time, demonstrate an autonomous, compact, ruggedized iodine frequency reference using a micro-integrated high power ECDL during a space flight.

2 Status of laser system qualification on sounding rockets

In three successful rocket missions, namely FOKUS [12], FOKUS Re-Flight and KALEXUS [11], we and partners have demonstrated the maturity of our laser systems and related technologies [26]. As part of the FOKUS mission, flown on the 23rd of April 2015, a frequency-stabilized laser system, shown in Figure 1(a), was qualified as master laser for the MAIUS laser system [10]. It is based on frequency modulation spectroscopy (FMS) of the D2 transition in 87Rb using a micro-integrated distributed feedback (DFB) laser module [27]. FOKUS demonstrated the first optical Doppler-free spectroscopy in space. Moreover, the laser frequency was compared to a Cesium (Cs) reference using an optical frequency comb (Menlo Systems) during flight, making the FOKUS mission a demonstrator for a null test of the gravitational red shift between the optical transition in Rb and a microwave Cs clock [12]. The FOKUS payload was flown again on the 17th of January 2016 aboard the TEXUS 53 sounding rocket under the name FOKUS Re-Flight together with KALEXUS. FOKUS Re-Flight, shown in Figure 1(b), was updated from FOKUS to a system based on modulation transfer spectroscopy (MTS) using a fiber-pigtailed phase modulator. The KALEXUS mission featured two micro-integrated extended cavity diode lasers (ECDL) [28] operating at 767 nm that were alternately offset-locked to each other and stabilized to potassium using FMS. This way, redundancy and autonomy concepts for future space missions were demonstrated [11]. The successful FOKUS and KALEXUS missions constitute important qualification steps for the MAIUS mission and towards its follow on missions MAIUS II and III aiming at dual species atom interferometry with Rb and K in space as well as planned satellite missions.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Photographs of three laser payloads successfully operated on sounding rocket flights. (a) FMS based DFB laser system for Rb spectroscopy (FOKUS, 215 mm ×170 mm ×50 mm, 2.1 kg), (b) MTS based DBF reference laser system for Rb spectroscopy (FOKUS-Reflight, 288 mm ×170 mm\(~\times \)50 mm, 3.0 kg) and (c) Potassium stabilized laser system with two ECDLs (KALEXUS, 345 mm × 218 mm\(~\times \)186 mm, 16 kg).

JOKARUS is based on the laser system heritage of these successful sounding rocket missions and is planned to operate on a sounding rocket mission end of 2017. The next section describes the JOKARUS system design and the estimated performance in context of laser interferometric ranging missions.

3 JOKARUS payload - system design

The JOKARUS payload, schematically shown in Figure 2, features a laser system based on a ECDL with an integrated optical amplifier operating at 1,064 nm, a spectroscopy module including the quasi-monolithic setup for modulation transfer spectroscopy of molecular iodine and two periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN) waveguide modules for second harmonic generation (SHG), as well as RF and control electronics for frequency stabilizing the ECDL laser to the spectroscopy setup. The individual subsystems are presented in the following sections.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Scheme of the JOKARUS payload including the laser system, spectroscopy and RF, electronics and experiment control. See text for details.

3.1 Laser system

The laser system is housed in a module as shown in Figure 3(a) and includes the laser, an electro-optic modulator (EOM) and an acousto-optic modulator (AOM) for preparation of the spectroscopy beams. The laser is a micro-integrated master-oscillator-power-amplifier-module (MOPA) developed and assembled by the Ferdinand-Braun-Institut (FBH), see Figure 3(b). The MOPA consists of a narrow-linewidth ECDL master oscillator operating at 1,064 nm and a high-power power amplifier. A previous generation of the laser module is described in [28] and details on the performance of the laser module and the technology applied for its integration will be given elsewhere [29]. The ECDL master oscillator provides an emission linewidth of less than 50 kHz (1 ms, FWHM) and allows for high bandwidth frequency control via control of the injection current. The laser module provides a fiber-coupled optical power of 500 mW at an injection current of 1,500 mA. This module was subject to a vibration qualification according to the requirements of the TEXUS program (8.8 grms), while similar laser modules of previous generations even passed 29 grms and 1,500 g pyroshock tests [28].
Figure 3
Figure 3

(a) CAD drawing of the JOKARUS laser system module (Laser system in Figure  2 ). From top to bottom: ECDL, optical isolator, EOM and AOM. The dimensions are 290 mm × 225 mm × 58 mm with a total mass of 3.5 kg. (b) A photograph of the assembled JOKARUS ECDL with dimensions of 128 mm × 78 mm × 23 mm and a total mass of 760 g.

In the laser system, see Figure 2, the MOPA is followed by an optical isolator (Thorlabs) and a 99:1 fiber splitter, where few mW are separated from the main beam for frequency measurements with the frequency comb that is part of another payload aboard the TEXUS 54 mission. A second fiber splitter divides the main beam into pump and probe beam for modulation transfer spectroscopy (MTS). The probe beam is connected to a fiber-coupled PPLN wave guide module (NTT Electronics) for second harmonic generation. The pump beam is frequency shifted by 150 MHz using a fiber-coupled AOM (Gooch & Housego) to shift spurious interference between pump and probe beam outside the detection bandwidth of the MTS signal. The frequency-shifted beam is then phase-modulated at ≈300 kHz by a fiber-coupled EOM (Jenoptik) and will later also be frequency-doubled by a second SHG module. Taking nominal losses of the components, splice connections and the conversion efficiency of the SHG modules into account, we expect an optical power of 10 mW and 3 mW for the pump and probe beam at 532 nm, respectively, which is sufficient for saturation spectroscopy. The power of the pump beam can be stabilized by using a voltage controlled attenuator (VCA) and a feedback loop (see Figure 2). Several fiber taps are used for power monitoring at various positions in the laser system during flight. The pump and probe beam are finally guided from the laser module to the spectroscopy module by polarization maintaining fibers at 1,064 nm and mating sleeves connectors.

All components of the laser system were qualified at a random vibration level of 8.8 grms (hard-mounted) to ensure their integrity after the boost phase of the rocket launch.

3.2 Spectroscopy module

The spectroscopy setup is housed in a separate module as shown in Figure 4 together with the SHG modules (cf. Figure 2). It is based on previous iterations of an iodine reference for deployment in space missions, developed at ZARM Bremen, DLR Bremen and the Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin [9]. The optical setup is realized using a special assembly integration technique [30], where the optical components are bonded directly on a base plate made from fused silica with a footprint of 246 mm × 145 mm resulting in a quasi-monolithic, mechanically and thermally stable spectroscopy setup as shown in Figure 4(b). An iodine setup using this assembly technique was subjected to environmental tests including vibrational loads up to 29 grms and thermal cycling from −20°C to +60°C [25].
Figure 4
Figure 4

(a) CAD drawing of the JOKARUS spectroscopy module (Spectroscopy in Figure  2 ). The two SHG modules are located at the top. The dimensions are 290 mm × 225 mm × 78 mm with a total mass of 6 kg. (b) Photograph of the assembled JOKARUS spectroscopy setup.

In the JOKARUS MTS setup, the pump beam is launched from a fiber collimator (Schäfter + Kirchhoff) with a beam diameter of 2 mm and is guided twice through an iodine cell with a length of 15 cm, resulting in an absorption length of 30 cm. Behind the cell, the pump beam is reflected at a thin film polarizer (TFP) and focused on a photo detector for optional power stabilization. The probe beam is launched with the same beam diameter and is split using a TFP into a probe and a reference beam for balanced detection using a noise-canceling detector adapted from [31], as shown in Figure 2. The iodine cell is provided by the Institute of Scientific Instruments of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (ISI) in Brno, filled with an unsaturated vapor pressure of ≈1 Pa [32]. From the experimental parameters of the spectroscopy module we estimate the expected operating linewidth Γ [20]
$$ \varGamma =(\varGamma _{\mathrm{nat.}}+\varGamma _{\mathrm{press.}}+\varGamma _{\mathrm{tof}}) \frac{\sqrt{1+S_{\mathrm{sat.}}}+\sqrt{1+S_{\mathrm{pr.}}}}{2}, $$
(1)
with the natural linewidth \(\varGamma _{\mathrm{nat.}}\), the contributions from pressure broadenig \(\varGamma _{\mathrm{press.}}\) and time-of-flight broadening \(\varGamma _{\mathrm{tof}}\) and the saturation parameter S of the saturating and the probe beam respectively. We take the natural linewidth \(\varGamma _{\mathrm{nat.}}\) of 220 kHz [20], the pressure broadening of 120 kHz Pa−1 [20] adds \(\varGamma _{\mathrm{press.}}\) of 120 kHz and the time-of-flight broadening \(\varGamma _{\mathrm{tof}}\) is 22 kHz for the beam diameter of 2 mm. The saturation parameter for the saturating and the probe beam will be set to ≈2 and ≈1, respectively. The expected operating linewidth Γ thus evaluates to ≈570 kHz.

3.3 Electronics

The electronic system for JOKARUS is segmented in 3 functional units. First, the RF electronics for the optic modulators shown in Figure 2. It is based on a direct digital synthesizer (DDS9m, Novatech Instruments), referenced to an oven-controlled crystal oscillator. The DDS provides a 150 MHz signal for the AOM and two signals for phase modulation of the pump beam via the EOM and analog demodulation of the MTS signal. Second, a stack of compact electronic cards by Menlo Systems based on the FOKUS flight electronics [12] are used for temperature control of the SHG modules and the diode laser, as current source for the ECDL-MOPA and for realizing the feedback control for laser frequency stabilization. The cards are controlled by an ARM based embedded system via a CAN interface, also providing an interface to higher level data acquisition. The third unit contains a 16-bit DAQ card that is used for data acquisition and the x86-based flight computer (exone IT). It runs the experiment control software that provides coarse tuning of the laser frequency, identification of the fine transition R(56)32-0 as well as invoking and controlling a PID feedback control for frequency stabilization to the selected hyperfine transition.

3.4 Payload assembly

The subsystems presented above are integrated in individual housings made from aluminum that share a common frame as a support structure shown in Figure 5. A water-cooled heat sink is integrated into the base frame for temperature control until liftoff. During flight, we expect an average temperature increase of about 3 K throughout the mechanical structure, based on nominal power consumption of 100 W. The optical fiber connection between the laser and spectroscopy units are realized via mating sleeves. The total payload has a dimension of 345 mm × 270 mm × 350 mm and a total mass of 25 kg, which allows for integration into the TEXUS sounding rocket format.
Figure 5
Figure 5

CAD drawing of the JOKARUS payload. The payload dimensions are 345 mm × 270 mm × 350 mm with a total mass of 25 kg and a power consumption of 100 W.

We estimated the performance of the JOKARUS system in terms of amplitude spectral density (ASD) of frequency noise in comparison to the frequency stability of an iodine reference developed, characterized and reported previously [9, 25], called elegant breadboard model (EBB). The frequency noise achieved with the EBB is shown in Figure 6 (green graph) together with the frequency noise of the free-running Nd:YAG laser (blue graph) used in this setup. The EBB fulfills the requirement on the frequency noise of planned space missions like LISA and NGGM.
Figure 6
Figure 6

Estimated frequency stability of JOKARUS in comparison to another iodine frequency reference (EBB) using an Nd:YAG laser. Frequency noise of the free-running Nd:YAG laser (blue) is suppressed by frequency stabilization to the EBB resulting in frequency noise depicted in green. The frequency noise of the ECDL is expected to be reduced to the frequency noise indicated by the red dashed line when locked to the JOKARUS spectroscopy module. The requirements on the laser frequency noise for missions like LISA and NGGM are shown in blue and yellow, respectively.

For the JOKARUS instrument we expect to achieve frequency noise on a level of 10 Hz/Hz1/2 (red dashed graph) at Fourier frequencies below 10 Hz which corresponds to a fractional frequency instability of \(2.4 \times 10^{-14}/\sqrt{ \tau }\) for averaging times above 100 ms. The performance was estimated from the frequency noise of the free-running ECDL (orange graph) assuming a control bandwidth of ≈100 kHz. The white frequency noise floor was estimated from the equation
$$ \sigma (\tau)=\frac{\varGamma }{\nu _{\mathrm{opt.}}}\frac{1}{S/N}\frac{1}{\sqrt{\tau }}, $$
(2)
which gives the fractional frequency instability of our laser locked a transition with Q-factor \(\nu _{\mathrm{opt}}/\varGamma \) and resolved with a signal-to-noise ratio \(S/N\) in a 1 Hz bandwidth. The signal-to-noise ratio \(S/N\) for FM-spectroscopy is estimated from [20]
$$ S/N=\frac{1}{2}J_{0}(\beta)J_{1}(\beta)\sqrt{ \frac{\eta }{2e B}}\Delta \alpha p L \sqrt{P_{\mathrm{pr.}}} $$
(3)
with the pressure p and absorption length L given by the spectroscopy setup, a probe beam power \(P_{\mathrm{pr.}}\) of 200 μW, detection efficiency \(\eta = 0.25\) A W−1, bandwidth \(B = 1/(2\pi)\mbox{ Hz}\) and the Bessel functions \(J_{n}(\beta)\) for the phase-modulation index β of ≈1. A factor 1/2 accounts for 3 dB above shot-noise detection expected from the noise canceling photo detector [31]. The peak absorption contrast Δα is calculated from [20]
$$ \Delta \alpha = \alpha _{0} \biggl( \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+S_{\mathrm{pr.}}}}- \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+S_{\mathrm{pr.}}+S_{\mathrm{sat.}}}} \biggr) $$
(4)
with \(\alpha _{0} = 1.3\times 10^{-3}\mbox{ cm}^{-1}\mbox{ Pa}^{-1}\) for transition R(56)32-0 [20]. With Eqs. (3), (4) and (1), the white frequency noise in terms of fractional frequency instability, Eq. (2), evaluates to \(\sigma (\tau) = 2.4\times 10^{-14}/\sqrt{\tau }\), which corresponds to a frequency noise amplitude spectral density of \(S_{f}(f)=\sqrt{2}\sigma \nu _{\mathrm{1{,}064 nm}}\), which evaluates to 10 Hz/Hz1/2 at 1,064 nm. The estimated performance is in agreement with the performance of the EBB, taking into account a factor of three shorter absorption length of the JOKARUS spectroscopy module compared to the EBB, and otherwise similar experimental parameter. We therefore expect the JOKARUS instrument to fulfill the requirements on the frequency noise of space missions like LISA and NGGM, where the long term instability needs to be characterized in beat-note measurements, e.g., with the EBB setup, to determine the Flicker noise floor and random walk noise of the JOKARUS frequency reference.

4 Conclusion

We presented the design of an absolute optical frequency reference developed as a payload for a sounding rocket mission and a potential candidate for space applications that require frequency-stable laser systems at 1,064 nm. The payload will be part of a sounding rocket mission planned for a launch end of 2017, where the optical frequency of the JOKARUS frequency reference will be compared to an optical frequency comb during a 6 min space flight. JOKARUS will demonstrate autonomous operation of an absolute optical frequency reference whose performance is expected to meet the requirement on the frequency noise of laser systems for future space missions such as LISA or NGGM. As a next step we see our diode laser technology being ready for in-orbit demonstration on small satellites. In a recently started project, we have begun to develop scenarios to study diode laser system and related technologies in orbit, specifically regarding long-term performance, radiation effects, and autonomy.

The assembly integration technology used for the iodine spectroscopy setup is a very promising technology for realization of compact and ruggedized space optical systems. Future space missions such as NGGM, LISA or MAQRO [33] can benefit from this technology heritage.

As demonstrated with the FOKUS and KALEXUS missions operating laser frequency references at 780 nm and 767 nm, respectively, this project further shows the versatility of the micro-integrated diode laser technology for the realization of compact and efficient laser systems for applications in the field. Such compact, reliable and ruggedized diode laser based frequency references are also a promising candidate for mobile atomic sensors and optical clocks on ground. Future space missions using laser or atom interferometry for geodesy, gravitational wave astronomy or quantum tests of the equivalence principle, together with the development of space optical clocks may benefit from this technology heritage and its first applications in space missions.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ulrich Johann and Alexander Sell from Airbus DS (Friedrichshafen) for support within the Laboratory of Enabling Technologies where the iodine spectroscopy unit was integrated. This work is supported by the German Space Agency DLR with funds provided by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy under grant numbers DLR 50WM 1646, 50 WM 1141, 50 WM 1545.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Newtonstr. 15, Berlin, 12489, Germany
(2)
Zentrum für angewandte Raumfahrttechnologie und Mikrogravitation (ZARM), Universität Bremen, Am Fallturm, Bremen, 28359, Germany
(3)
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Raumfahrtsysteme, Linzer Straße 1, Bremen, 28359, Germany
(4)
Menlo Systems GmbH, Am Klopferspitz 19a, Martinsried, 82153, Germany
(5)
Ferdinand-Braun-Institut, Leibniz-Institut für Höchstfrequenztechnik, Gustav-Kirchhoff-Str. 4, Berlin, 12489, Germany

References

  1. Aguilera DN, Ahlers H, Battelier B, Bawamia A, Bertoldi A, Bondarescu R, et al.. STE-QUEST test of the universality of free fall using cold atom interferometry. Class Quantum Gravity. 2014;31(11):115010. ADSView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. D’Incao J, Krutzik M, Eliott E, Williams J. Enhanced association and dissociation of heteronuclear Feshbach molecules in a microgravity environment. Phys Rev A. 2017;95:012701. ADSView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Jet Propulsion Laboratory. CAL, Cold Atom Laboratory. CAL project webpage; 2017. Online; accessed 27-February-2017. http://coldatomlab.jpl.nasa.gov/.
  4. Tino GM, Sorrentino F, Aguilera D, Battelier B, Bertoldi A, Bodart Q, et al.. Precision gravity tests with atom interferometry in space. Nucl Phys B, Proc Suppl. 2013;243:203-17. ADSView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Williams J, Chiow SW, Yu N, Müller H. Quantum test of the equivalence principle and space-time aboard the International Space Station. New J Phys. 2016; 18(18). Google Scholar
  6. Stamminger A, Ettl J, Grosse J, Hörschgen-Eggers M, Jung W, Kallenbach A, et al. MAIUS-1 - vehicle, subsystems design and mission operations. 2015;SP-730:183-90. Google Scholar
  7. Vitale S. Space-borne gravitational wave observatories. Gen Relativ Gravit. 2014;46(5):1730. ADSView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Kawamura S, Ando M, Nakamura T, Tsubono K, Tanaka T, Funaki I, et al.. The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna - DECIGO. J Phys Conf Ser. 2008;122:012006. View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Schuldt T, Döringshoff K, Kovalchuk EV, Keetman A, Pahl J, Peters A, et al.. Development of a compact optical absolute frequency reference for space with 10−15 instability. Appl Opt. 2017;56(4):1101-6. ADSView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Schkolnik V, Hellmig O, Wenzlawski A, Grosse J, Kohfeldt A, Döringshoff K, et al.. A compact and robust diode laser system for atom interferometry on a sounding rocket. Appl Phys B. 2016;122(8):217. ADSView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Dinkelaker AN, Schiemangk M, Schkolnik V, Kenyon A, Lampmann K, Wenzlawski A, et al.. Autonomous frequency stabilization of two extended-cavity diode lasers at the potassium wavelength on a sounding rocket. Appl Opt. 2017;56(5):1388-96. http://ao.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-56-5-1388. ADSView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Lezius M, Wilken T, Deutsch C, Giunta M, Mandel O, Thaller A, et al.. Space-borne frequency comb metrology. Opt. 2016;3(12):1381-7. Google Scholar
  13. Lévèque T, Faure B, Esnault FX, Delaroche C, Massonnet D, Grosjean O, et al.. PHARAO laser source flight model: design and performances. Rev Sci Instrum. 2015;86(3):033104. ADSView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lévèque T, Antoni-Micollier L, Faure B, Berthon J. A laser setup for rubidium cooling dedicated to space applications. Appl Phys B. 2014;116(4):997-1004. ADSView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Laurent P, Massonnet D, Cacciapuoti L, Salomon C. The ACES/PHARAO space mission. C R Phys. 2015;16(5):540-52. The measurement of time/La mesure du temps. View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Świerad D, Häfner S, Vogt S, Venon B, Holleville D, Bize S, et al.. Ultra-stable clock laser system development towards space applications. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33973. ADSView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Grosse J, Seidel S, Krutzik M, Scharringhausen M, van Zoest T. Thermal and mechanical design of the MAIUS atom interferometer sounding rocket payload. 2014;1:434-444. doi:10.2514/6.2014-4210.
  18. Ye J, Robertsson L, Picard S, Ma L-S, Hall JL. Absolute frequency atlas of molecular \(I_{2}\) lines at 532 nm. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 1999;48(2):544-9. View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Nevsky AY, Holzwarth R, Reichert J, Udem T, Hänsch TW, Zanthier J, et al.. Frequency comparison and absolute frequency measurement of \(I_{2}\)-stabilized lasers at 532 nm. Opt Commun. 2001;192(3-6):263-72. ADSView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ishibashi C, Ye J, Hall JL. Issues and applications in ultrasensitive molecular spectroscopy. vol. 4634. 2002. p.58-69. doi:10.1117/12.463838.
  21. Hong FL, Ishikawa J, Bi Z-Y, Zhang J, Seta K, Onae A, et al.. Portable \(I_{2}\)-stabilized Nd:YAG laser for international comparisons. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2001;50(2):486-9. View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Musha M, Nakagawa K, Ueda K. Developments of a space-borne stabilized laser for DECIGO and DPF. Int Conf Space Opt Syst Appl. 2012;12:10-2. Google Scholar
  23. Leonhardt V, Camp JB. Space interferometry application of laser frequency stabilization with molecular iodine. Appl Opt. 2006;45(17):4142-6. ADSView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Argence B, Halloin H, Jeannin O, Prat P, Turazza O, de Vismes E, et al.. Molecular laser stabilization at low frequencies for the LISA mission. Phys Rev. 2010;81(8):1-8. Google Scholar
  25. Schuldt T, Döringshoff K, Milke A, Sanjuan J, Gohlke M, Kovalchuk EV, et al.. High-performance optical frequency references for space. J Phys Conf Ser. 2016;723(1):012047. View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Duncker H, Hellmig O, Wenzlawski A, Grote A, Rafipoor AJ, Rafipoor M, et al.. Ultrastable, Zerodur-based optical benches for quantum gas experiments. Appl Opt. 2014;53(20):4468-74. ADSView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Schiemangk M, Lampmann K, Dinkelaker A, Kohfeldt A, Krutzik M, Kürbis C, et al.. High-power, micro-integrated diode laser modules at 767 and 780 nm for portable quantum gas experiments. Appl Opt. 2015;54(17):5332-8. ADSView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Luvsandamdin E, Kürbis C, Schiemangk M, Sahm A, Wicht A, Peters A, et al.. Micro-integrated extended cavity diode lasers for precision potassium spectroscopy in space. Opt Express. 2014;22(7):7790-8. ADSView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kürbis C, et al. Extended cavity diode laser master-oscillator-power-amplifier for precision iodine spectroscopy in space. In preparation. 2017. Google Scholar
  30. Ressel S, Gohlke M, Rauen D, Schuldt T, Kronast W, Mescheder U, et al.. Ultrastable assembly and integration technology for ground- and space-based optical systems. Appl Opt. 2010;49(22):4296-303. ADSView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Hobbs PC. Ultrasensitive laser measurements without tears. Appl Opt. 1997;36(4):903-20. ADSView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hrabina J, Šarbort M, Acef O, Burck FD, Chiodo N, Holá M, et al.. Spectral properties of molecular iodine in absorption cells filled to specified saturation pressure. Appl Opt. 2014;53(31):7435-41. ADSView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaltenbaek R, Aspelmeyer M, Barker PF, Bassi A, Bateman J, Bongs K, et al.. Macroscopic quantum resonators (MAQRO): 2015 update. EPJ Quantum Technol. 2016;3(1):5. View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement