Skip to main content

Microwave electrometry with bichromatic electromagnetically induced transparency in Rydberg atoms


A scheme for measuring microwave (MW) electric (E) fields is proposed based on bichromatic electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) in Rydberg atoms. A bichromatic control field drives the excited state transition, whose absorption shows three EIT windows. When a MW field drives the Rydberg transition, the EIT windows split and six transmission peaks appear. It is interesting to find that the peak-to-peak distance of transmission spectrum is sensitive to the MW field strength, which can be used to measure MW E-field. Simulation results show that the spectral resolution could be increased by about 4 times, and the minimum detectable strength of the MW E-field may be improved by about 3 times compared with the common EIT scheme. After the Doppler averaging, the minimum detectable MW E-field strength is about 5 times larger than that without Doppler effect. Also, we investigate other effects on the sensitivity of the system.

1 Introduction

Microwave (MW) electric (E) field measurement has great technological importance in electronic information systems, which have been widely used in radar [1, 2], communications [35], navigation [6, 7], remote sensing [8], etc. Traditional MW measurement is based on dipole antennas, which is limited to receiving sensitivity, self-calibration, antenna size and so on [9]. Rydberg atoms have large electric dipole moments, which are extremely sensitive to external electric field [10]. Rydberg atom-based MW metrology has been explored with quantum technology [1113], e.g., electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) [1417], Autler-Townes (AT) splitting [18, 19], electromagnetically induced absorption (EIA) [20, 21], and active Raman gain (ARG) [22, 23]. At present, many promising schemes have been proposed for measuring MW fields, using frequency detuning [24], homodyne detection [25], intracavity atomic systems [26], double dark states [27, 28], dispersion [29], nonlinear effects [30] and deep learning [31], etc.

Bichromatic EIT can improve the fluorescence, absorption and transmission spectra of atoms [3234]. Wang et al. first experimentally demonstrated bichromatic EIT in cold atoms and observed multiple absorption peaks [35]. Later, Yan et al. experimentally observed double symmetrical EIT windows instead of multiple absorption peaks in hot atomic vapors [36]. In recent years, four-wave mixing (FWM) signals in such systems has attracted great interest [3739]. For example, multi-channel FWM process [40], phase compensation induced by anomalous dispersion [41], and high-efficiency reflection [42]. Also, bichromatic field has other important applications, such as optical nonreciprocity [43], optical bistability [44], optomechanical bichromatic wavelength switching [45], multimode circuit electromechanical systems [46], cross-phase modulation [47], and attosecond polarization [48]. While, few research involves the application of bichromatic EIT in MW E-field measurement.

Here, we present a scheme for MW E-field measurement by using bichromatic EIT in Rydberg atoms. First, a Doppler-free configuration is considered, where the probe field counter-propagates with the bichromatic control field. When the bichromatic control field drives the excited state transition, the EIT spectrum shows three transmission peaks. With coupling of a MW field, the transmission peaks split into six. The frequency splitting of the transmission peaks is linearly related to the MW field strength. This can be used to measure MW E-field. The numerical results show that the linewidth of the central transmission peaks may be narrowed to 1/4 of the common EIT scheme, and the minimum detectable strength of the MW E-field could be improved by about 3 times. Fortunately, if the probe and bichromatic control fields co-propagate through the atomic vapor, the Doppler effect greatly narrows the central transmission peaks, and the minimum detectable MW E-field strength is about 5 times larger than that without Doppler effect. The scheme may be useful for designing novel MW sensing devices.

2 Model and basic equations

The four-level Rydberg atomic system we considered is shown in Fig. 1(a). A bichromatic control field \(E_{c}(t) = (E_{c1}e^{- i\omega_{ c1}t} + E_{c2}e^{- i\omega_{c2}t})/2 + c.c{.}\) drives the transition \(|2\rangle \rightarrow |3\rangle \) with frequency difference \(\omega _{c2} - \omega _{c1} = \delta\). A weak probe field \(E_{p}(t) = E_{p} e^{- i\omega_{p} t} /2 + c.c{.}\) drives the transition \(|1\rangle \rightarrow |2\rangle \), and a MW field \(E_{m}(t) = E_{m} e^{- i\omega_{m} t}/2 + c.c{.}\) drives the Rydberg transition \(|3\rangle \rightarrow|4\rangle \). The relevant quantum states \(|1\rangle \), \(|2\rangle \), \(|3\rangle \) and \(|4\rangle \) correspond to the rubidium-87 atomic levels \(5S_{1/2}(F = 2)\), \(5P_{3/2}(F = 3)\), \(53D_{5/2}\), and \(54P_{5/2}\), respectively. Figure 1(c) shows the schematic configuration of the coupling fields and the atomic vapor cell. The probe and bichromatic control fields counter-propagate through the atomic vapour, which belongs to a Doppler-free scheme.

Figure 1
figure 1

(a) Four-level Rydberg atomic model, (b) the corresponding dressed picture and (c) schematic diagram of the experiment

After the electric dipole approximation, the Hamiltonian of the system in the interaction picture is given by [49]

$$\begin{aligned} H =& \hbar \omega _{1} \vert 1 \rangle \bigl\langle 1 \vert + \hbar \omega _{2} \vert 2 \bigr\rangle \bigl\langle 2 \vert + \hbar \omega _{3} \vert 3 \bigr\rangle \bigl\langle 3 \vert + \hbar \omega _{4} \vert 4 \bigr\rangle \bigl\langle 4 \vert \\ &{}- \hbar \bigl[ \Omega _{p}e^{ - i\omega _{p}t} \vert 2 \bigr\rangle \bigl\langle 1 \vert + \bigl( \Omega _{c1}e^{ - i\omega _{c1}t} + \Omega _{c2}e^{ - i\omega _{c2}t} \bigr) \vert 3 \bigr\rangle \bigl\langle 2 \vert \\ &{} + \Omega _{m}e^{ - i\omega _{m}t} \bigl\vert 4 \bigr\rangle \langle 3 \bigr\vert + H.C. \bigr], \end{aligned}$$

where the Rabi frequencies of the probe, control, and MW fields are, respectively, denoted as \(\Omega _{p} = E_{p} \mu _{12} /\hslash \), \(\Omega _{c1(c2)} = E_{c1 (c2)} \mu _{23} /\hslash \) and \(\Omega _{m} = E_{m} \mu _{34} /\hslash \). \(\mu _{i j}\) and \(\omega_{i j}\) are the relevant dipole moment and transition frequency from \(|i\rangle \) to \(|j\rangle \) (\(i, j \in \{1, 2, 3, 4\}\)). \(E_{p}\), \(E_{c1(c2)}\), and \(E_{m}\) are the respective amplitudes of the laser fields. The dynamic evolution of the system can be described by solving the master equation [50]

$$ \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = - \frac{i}{\hbar} [ H,\rho ] + L ( \rho ), $$

where ρ is the density operator and \(L(\rho )\) denotes the decoherence processes. And then we obtain the time evolution of density matrix elements as follows:

$$\begin{aligned}& \begin{aligned} & \dot{\rho}_{21} = - \gamma _{21}\rho _{21} - i \bigl[ \omega _{21}\rho _{21} - \Omega _{p}e^{ - i\omega _{p}t} ( \rho _{22} - \rho _{11} ) + \bigl( - \Omega _{c1}e^{ - i\omega _{c1}t} - \Omega _{c2}e^{ - i\omega _{c2}t} \bigr)\rho _{31} \bigr], \\ &\dot{\rho}_{31} = - \gamma _{31}\rho _{31} - i \bigl[ ( \omega _{21} + \omega _{32} )\rho _{31} + \Omega _{m}e^{ - i\omega _{m}t}\rho _{41} + \Omega _{p}e^{ - i\omega _{p}t}\rho _{32} \\ &\hphantom{\dot{\rho}_{31} =}{} + \bigl( - \Omega _{c1}e^{ - i\omega _{c1}t} - \Omega _{c2}e^{ - i\omega _{c2}t} \bigr)\rho _{21} \bigr], \\ &\dot{\rho}_{41} = - \gamma _{41}\rho _{41} - i \bigl[ ( \omega _{21} + \omega _{32} - \omega _{43} )\rho _{41} + \Omega _{m}e^{ - i\omega _{m}t}\rho _{31} + \Omega _{p}e^{ - i\omega _{p}t}\rho _{42} \bigr], \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$

with the closure relationship \(\rho _{11} + \rho _{22} + \rho _{33} + \rho _{44} = 1\). \(\gamma_{j k} = (\Gamma _{j} + \Gamma _{k})/2\), \(\Gamma _{j} = \sum_{k} \Gamma _{j k}\) (\(j, k = 1, 2, 3, 4\)), where \(\Gamma _{j k}\) is the spontaneous decay rate from state \(|j\rangle \) to state \(|k\rangle \). We perform a rotating-frame transformation using \(\rho _{21} = \tilde{\rho}_{21}e^{ - i\omega _{p}t}\), \(\rho _{31} = \tilde{\rho}_{31}e^{ - i ( \omega _{p} + \omega _{c1} )t}\) and \(\rho _{41} = \tilde{\rho}_{41}e^{ - i ( \omega _{p} + \omega _{c1} - \omega _{m} )t}\). The density-matrix element \(\tilde{\rho}_{ij}\) can be expanded in terms of Fourier components as

$$ \tilde{\rho}_{ij} = \sum \tilde{\rho}_{ij}^{ ( n )}e^{ - in\delta t} \quad \bigl( i,j \in \{ 1,2,3,4 \},n = 0, \pm 1, \ldots \bigr). $$

We keep the first order of the probe and all orders of the control and MW fields, and get

$$ \begin{aligned} &\tilde{\rho}_{21}^{ ( n )} = \frac{i ( \tilde{\rho}_{31}^{ ( n )}\Omega _{c1} + \tilde{\rho}_{31}^{ ( n - 1 )}\Omega _{c2} + \Omega _{p} )}{\gamma _{21} + i\Delta _{p} - in\delta}, \\ &\tilde{\rho}_{31}^{ ( n )} = \frac{ - i\tilde{\rho}_{21}^{ ( n )}\Omega _{c1} - i\tilde{\rho}_{21}^{ ( n + 1 )}\Omega _{c2}}{ - \gamma _{31} + in\delta - i ( \Delta _{p} + \Delta _{c1} ) - \frac{i\Omega _{m}^{2}}{i\gamma _{41} + n\delta + \Delta _{m} - \Delta _{p} - \Delta _{c1}}}, \\ &\tilde{\rho}_{41}^{ ( n )} = \frac{\tilde{\rho}_{31}^{ ( n )}\Omega _{m}}{i\gamma _{41} + n\delta + \Delta _{m} - \Delta _{p} - \Delta _{c1}}, \end{aligned} $$

where \(\Delta _{p} = \omega _{p} - \omega _{21}\), \(\Delta _{c1} = \omega _{c1}- \omega _{32}\) and \(\Delta _{m} = \omega _{m} - \omega _{43}\) are the detunings of the probe, control and MW fields, respectively. The solution of \(\tilde{\rho}_{21}^{ ( n )}\) is obtained from the recursion relation as

$$ \tilde{\rho}_{21}^{ ( n )} = D_{n}^{ - 1} \biggl[ - i\Omega _{p} + \frac{\tilde{\rho}_{21}^{ ( n - 1 )}\Omega _{c1}^{ *} \Omega _{c2}}{X_{n - 1}} + \frac{\tilde{\rho}_{21}^{ ( n + 1 )}\Omega _{c1}\Omega _{c2}^{ *}}{X_{n}} \biggr], $$

where \(X_{n} = - \gamma _{31} + in\delta - i ( \Delta _{p} + \Delta _{c1} ) + i \Omega _{m}^{2}/ ( i \gamma _{41} + n\delta + \Delta _{m} - \Delta _{p} - \Delta _{c1} )\) and \(D_{n} = - \gamma _{21} - i ( \Delta _{p} - n\delta ) - \Omega _{c1}^{2}/X_{n} - \Omega _{c2}^{2}/X_{n - 1}\). We can obtain the coherent term \(\tilde{\rho}_{21}^{ ( 0 )}\) with a continued fraction method [42]

$$ \tilde{\rho}_{21}^{ ( 0 )} = \frac{ - i\Omega _{p}}{D_{0} - \frac{\Omega _{c1}\Omega _{c2}^{ *} W_{1}}{ - \gamma _{31} - i ( \Delta _{p} + \Delta _{c1} ) - \frac{i\Omega _{m}^{2}}{i\gamma _{41} + \Delta _{m} - \Delta _{p} - \Delta _{c1}}} - \frac{\Omega _{c1}^{ *} \Omega _{c2}V_{1}}{ - \gamma _{31} - i ( \Delta _{p} + \Delta _{c2} ) - \frac{i\Omega _{m}^{2}}{i\gamma _{41} + \Delta _{m} - \Delta _{p} - \Delta _{c2}}}}, $$

where \(\Delta _{c2} =\Delta _{c1}- \delta\), \(W_{1} = \tilde{\rho}_{21}^{ ( 1 )}/\tilde{\rho}_{21}^{ ( 0 )}\) and \(V_{1} = \tilde{\rho}_{21}^{ ( 1 )}/\tilde{\rho}_{21}^{ ( 2 )}\). The susceptibility χ is found to be \(\chi = N\mu _{21}^{2}\tilde{\rho}_{21}^{ ( 0 )}/\hbar \varepsilon _{0}\Omega _{p}\), where \(\varepsilon _{0}\) is the permittivity of vacuum, N is the atomic density, and ħ is the reduced Planck’s constant. The transmission spectrum can be described as [51]

$$ T = \exp \bigl( - 2\pi \ell \operatorname{Im} [ \chi ] / \lambda _{p} \bigr), $$

where is the medium length and \(\lambda _{p}\) is the center wavelength of probe field.

3 Results and discussion

We consider the 87Rb atoms within a vapor cell of length 5.0 cm. The probe field, 780 nm, is tuned to the \(|1\rangle \rightarrow |2\rangle \) transition. The control field, 480 nm, drives \(|2\rangle \rightarrow |3\rangle \) transition. The Rydberg transition \(|3\rangle \rightarrow |4\rangle \) is driven by the MW field. In the following discussion, the parameters are scaled by \(\Gamma = 2\pi \times 6\) MHz for simplicity. First, let us briefly discuss the absorption spectra of common EIT scheme. If the MW field \(\Omega _{m} = 0\), there is an EIT window (see red dotted line in Fig. 2(a)). With coupling of the MW field, an absorption peak appears in the EIT window, i.e., bright resonance [11] (see red dotted line in Fig. 2(b)). Here, we are interested in the absorptive features of bichromatic EIT spectra, as shown by the solid blue line in Fig. 2. Without coupling of the MW field, there are four absorption peaks in EIT spectrum (see Fig. 2(a)). When the MW field drives the Rydberg transition, the two side absorption peaks and the central EIT window split, resulting in seven absorption peaks (see Fig. 2(b)).

Figure 2
figure 2

Comparison of absorption spectra driven by bichromatic control field (blue) and single control field (red). (a) \(\Omega _{m} = 0\) and (b) \(\Omega _{m} = 0.5\Gamma \). Other parameters are \(\Omega _{c1} = \Omega _{c2} = 1\Gamma \), \(\Delta _{c1} =\Delta _{m} = 0\), \(\delta = 6\Gamma \), \(\gamma _{21} =\Gamma = 2\pi \times 6\) MHz, \(\gamma _{31} = 2\pi \times 1\) kHz and \(\gamma _{41} = 2\pi \times 0.5\) kHz

The results can be interpreted in the dressed-state picture, as shown in Fig. 1(b). It is known that the central EIT window originates from inter-path interference of the transitions \(|1\rangle \rightarrow |\pm 1\rangle \). The dressed-states created by the bichromatic control field consist of infinite ladders with an equal separation δ [52]. In particular, when \(\Omega _{c1}\), \(\Omega _{c2} < \delta\), the transition amplitude will be dominant only for a few dressed-states around \(|m = 0\rangle \) [35]. The probe transitions from \(|1\rangle \) to the dressed-states \(|m = \pm 1, \pm 2\rangle \) lead to four absorption peaks. When the Rydberg transition \(|3\rangle \rightarrow |4\rangle \) is driven by the MW field \(\Omega _{m}\), five new eigenstates appear, i.e., \(|0\rangle \), \(|\pm a\rangle \) and \(|\pm b\rangle \). So, there are seven transition channels with the coupling of the probe field, \(|1\rangle \rightarrow |m = 0,\pm 1,\pm a,\pm b\rangle \), which contribute to seven absorption peaks.

Next, we focus on the bichromatic EIT transmission with the MW fields. If \(\Omega _{m} = 0\), there are three transmission peaks around \(\Delta _{\mathrm{p}} = 0\), \(\pm 6\Gamma \) (see blue solid line in Fig. 3(a)). It is consistent with the result of Ref. [35] under the given conditions, e.g., \(\Omega _{c1} = \Omega _{c2} = 0.5\Gamma \) and \(\Delta _{c1} = \Delta _{c2} = \delta /2 = \Gamma \). When the MW field is applied, e.g., \(\Omega _{m} = 0.5\Gamma \), the three transmission peaks split into six via the EIT-AT effect (see blue solid line in Fig. 3(b)). Figure 3(c) depicts the bichromatic EIT transmission spectra with a varying MW field strength \(\Omega _{m}\). The frequency splitting of transmission peaks becomes larger with the increase of \(\Omega _{m}\). It is interesting to find that the peak-to-peak distance Δf is proportional to the MW field strength, as shown in Fig. 3(d). Their linear relationship can be written as \(\Delta f = 2\Omega _{m}\), and the magnitude of the applied MW E-field can be estimated by

$$ \vert E_{m} \vert = \frac{\hbar \Omega _{m}}{\mu _{34}} = \frac{\hbar \Delta f}{2\mu _{34}}. $$
Figure 3
figure 3

(a) Transmission spectra with \(\Omega _{m} = 0\) and (b) is the same as (a) except for \(\Omega _{m} = 0.5\Gamma \); (c) bichromatic control field-driven transmission spectra with different MW fields; (d) peak-to-peak distance Δf versus MW field strength \(\Omega _{m}\), and other parameters are the same as in Fig. 2

It is worth mentioning that the frequency splitting of the side peaks also has the good linear relationship with the MW E-field strength. Of course, the linear relationship between Δf and \(\vert E_{m} \vert \) will fail and become nonlinear when \(\Omega _{m} < 0.0025\Gamma \).

Moreover, the linewidth of the central transmission peak is much narrower than that of the common EIT transmission peak (see Fig. 3(b)). The linewidth narrowing can be understood from the high dispersion produced by the bichromatic EIT. Figure 4 shows the real (\(\operatorname{Re}[\chi ]\)) and imaginary (\(\operatorname{Im}[\chi ]\)) parts of the atomic susceptibility. The bichromatic EIT dispersion \(\partial \operatorname{Re}[\chi ]/\partial \omega _{p}\) is larger than that of the common EIT scheme in Fig. 4(a). The larger dispersion, the larger frequency pulling effect, and then the resonance frequency is strongly pulled to its bichromatic EIT frequency. As a result, the two EIT windows are narrowed, resulting in two narrow peaks in the bichromatic EIT transmission (see red dashed line in Fig. 4).

Figure 4
figure 4

Susceptibility as a function of probe field detuning \(\Delta _{p}\). \(\operatorname{Re}[\chi ]\) (blue solid line) and \(\operatorname{Im}[\chi ]\) (red dash line) for (a) single and (b) bichromatic control fields. Other parameters are the same as in Fig. 2

The linewidth can be described as [14]

$$ \Delta _{\mathrm{width}} = \frac{\Omega _{c1}^{2} + \Omega _{p}^{2}}{\sqrt{\Gamma _{21}\gamma _{21}}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{\sigma N\ell}}\quad (\sigma N \ell \gg 1), $$

where \(\sigma = 3\lambda _{p}^{2}/2\pi \) is the absorption cross section, N is the atomic denstiy, and is the medium length. The numerical results show that the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the bichromatic EIT central transmission peaks is about 0.24Γ. While, the FWHM of the common EIT transmission peaks is about 0.9Γ. The linewidth is narrowed to about 1/4 of the common EIT scheme. The spectral resolution is intimately related to the EIT linewidth [21, 53]. This indicates that the spectral resolution could be increased by about 4 times under the given conditions. Moreover, the application of narrow EIT spectrum would compress the nonlinear zoom of frequency splitting and decrease the uncertainty of the MW E-field measurements [54]. So the inter-path interference leads to the narrow EIT spectrum, contributing to the sensitive measurement of MW E-fields.

The minimum detectable strength is important for the weak MW E-field measurement, which depends on the minimum detectable splitting of the transmission peak. In a weak MW field regime, the frequency splitting strongly depends on the EIT linewidth that is related to the Rabi frequency of control (probe) field (see equation (10)) [54]. The frequency splitting Δf decreases as \(\Omega _{c1(p)}\) decreases. The minimum detectable strength of the MW E-field is given by [55]

$$ \vert E_{\min} \vert = \frac{\hbar \Delta _{\mathrm{width}}}{2\mu _{34}}, $$

where \(\Delta _{\mathrm{width}} < \Delta f\). The linear relationship between Δf and \(\vert E_{m} \vert \) from equation (9) is valid and can be used to determine the E-field strength when the EIT linewidth is small compared to the frequency splitting [15]. This means that the narrow EIT linewidth would enable the frequency splitting to be observed at a weak MW field [21, 26].

According to the Rayleigh criterion [56], the minimum detectable splitting means that the splitting of two peaks is about half maximum of its peak value. For the common EIT scheme, when \(\Omega _{m} = 0.007\Gamma \), the transmission peaks overlap partly and are just discernible, as shown in Fig. 5(a). While, the bichromatic EIT transmission peaks are clearly separated from each other (see Fig. 5(b)). Under the given condition, the minimum detectable strength of the MW field is about \(\Omega _{m} = 0.0025\Gamma \) from the simulation. It is about 1/3 of the common EIT scheme, \({\sim} 0.007\Gamma \). This indicates that the minimum detectable MW E-field strength could be enhanced about 3 times. In other words, the inter-path interference much narrow the EIT linewidth and improve the sensitivity of minimum MW E-field.

Figure 5
figure 5

(a) Single control field-driven and (b) bichromatic control field-driven transmission spectra (inset is zoomed views of central peaks), and other parameters are the same as in Fig. 2

In addition, we consider the longitudinal motion of atoms at randomly distributed velocity v. It is instructive to examine the MW E-field measurement with Doppler effect, i.e., the probe and control fields \(\Omega _{c1}\) (or \(\Omega _{c1}\) and \(\Omega _{c2}\)) co-propagating through the atomic cell. Here, the susceptibility with atomic motion should be expressed as \(\chi ( v ) = N\mu _{21}^{2}\int \tilde{\rho}_{21}^{ ( 0 )} ( v ) * D ( v )/\hbar \varepsilon _{0}\Omega _{p}\,dv\), where \(\Delta _{p}\), \(\Delta _{c1}\) and \(\Delta _{c2}\) are replaced with \(\Delta _{p} + k_{p} v\), \(\Delta _{c1} + k_{c1}v\) and \(\Delta _{c2}\pm k_{c2}v\) respectively (+ for the x-axis), \(D ( v ) = \exp ( - v^{2}/v_{p}^{2} )/\pi ^{1/2}v_{p}\), represents the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution of atoms, and \(v_{p}\) is the most probable velocity. For simplicity, we assume that the wavevector \(\vert k_{p} \vert \approx \vert k_{c1} \vert \approx \vert k_{c2} \vert \approx \vert k \vert \).

Figure 6 shows the Doppler-averaged transmission spectrum. When the control fields \(\Omega _{c1}\) and \(\Omega _{c2}\) counter-propagate through the atomic vapor, the central transmission peaks are much narrowed and the side peaks decrease sharply (see Fig. 6(a)). It is consistent with the result of Ref. [36] under the given conditions, e.g., \(\Omega _{c1}=\Omega _{c2}=\Gamma \) and \(\Delta _{c1}=\Delta _{c2}=\delta /2 = 0.05\Gamma \). This result originates from the shift of the dressed levels and the modification to the transition probability between dressed states when the Doppler effect is considered [57]. The sum of all contributions by atoms with different velocities results in the narrowed transmission spectrum. In this case, the minimum detectable MW field strength is about \(\Omega _{m} = 0.00125\Gamma \), as illustrated in Fig. 6(c). Figure 6(b) depicts the transmission of the control field \(\Omega _{c1}\) and \(\Omega _{c2}\) co-propagating with the probe field. The central transmission peaks are further narrowed under the same conditions. The minimum detectable strength of the MW field is about \(\Omega _{m} = 0.00045\Gamma \) from the simulation (see Fig. 6(d)). It is about 1/5 of that without Doppler averaging, \({\sim} 0.0025\Gamma \). This indicates that the minimal detectable MW E-field strength could be improved by more than 5 times after Doppler averaging.

Figure 6
figure 6

Transmission of the bichromatic control field with Doppler effect for the counter-propagation (a) and co-propagation (b) cases; (c) is the same as (a) except for \(\Omega _{m} = 0.00125\Gamma \) and (d) is the same as (b) except for \(\Omega _{m} = 0.00045\Gamma \) (inset is zoomed views of central peaks). Other parameters are the same as in Fig. 2

At last, the effect of frequency detuning on the transmission of the probe field is investigated. Take control fields \(\Omega _{c1}\) and \(\Omega _{c2}\) counter-propagation for example, Fig. 7(a) shows the transmission peaks with a varying MW field detuning \(\Delta _{m}\). The peak-to-peak distance Φf is enlarged with an increase in \(\Delta _{m}\), which can be expressed as \(\Phi f = ( \Delta _{m}^{2} + ( 2\Omega _{m} )^{2} )^{1/2}\). This result is consistent with Ref. [24], and indicates that frequency detuning could improve the sensitivity of MW E-field measurements. In Fig. 7(b), the central transmission peaks shift with the bichromatic control field detuning (\(\Delta = \Delta _{c1}=\Delta _{c2}\)), while both the linewidth and the peak-to-peak distance basically remain unchanged. The bichromatic EIT scheme shows some tunability and may allow the MW E-field measurement in a broad frequency range.

Figure 7
figure 7

Transmission spectra of the probe field at different MW field detuning (a) and bichromatic control field detuning (b). Other parameters are the same as in Fig. 2

4 Conclusions

In summary, we propose a scheme for MW E-field measurement based on the bichromatic EIT in Rydberg atoms. Due to the inter-channel EIT interference, the EIT spectrum exhibits multiple narrow transmission peaks. It is interesting to find that the frequency splitting of transmission peaks shows a linear relationship with the MW field strength, which can be used to measure the MW E-field. The numerical results show that the spectral resolution may be enhanced by about 4 times, and the minimum detectable strength of the MW E-field is about 3 times larger than that of the common EIT scheme. If the Doppler scheme is adopted, the minimum detectable MW E-field strength could be further increased by about 5 times after Doppler averaging. The bichromatic EIT scheme exhibits high sensitivity, high resolution, and a broad detection range, which may help to design novel MW-sensing devices.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. Pan S, Zhang Y. Microwave photonic radars. J Lightwave Technol. 2020;38:5450–84.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Panda SSS, Panigrahi T, Parne SR, Sabat SL, Cenkeramaddi LR. Recent advances and future directions of microwave photonic radars: a review. IEEE Sens J. 2021;21:21144–58.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang X, Qin T, Qin Y, Witte RS, Microwave-Induced XH. Thermoacoustic communications. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2017;65:3369–78.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Meyer DH, Cox KC, Fatemi FK, Digital KPD. Communication with Rydberg atoms & amplitude-modulated microwave fields. Appl Phys Lett. 2018;112:211108.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Du Y, Cong N, Wei X, Zhang X, Luo W, He J et al.. Realization of multiband communications using different Rydberg final states. AIP Adv. 2022;12:065118.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Li X, Wu D, Miao Q, Zhu H, Wei T. A navigation ranging scheme with true random entangled microwave signals. IEEE Photonics J. 2018;10:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu Y, Bao Y. Review of electromagnetic waves-based distance measurement technologies for remote monitoring of civil engineering structures. Measurement. 2021;176:109193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim Y, Kimball JS, McDonald KC, Glassy J. Developing a global data record of daily landscape freeze/thaw status using satellite passive microwave remote sensing. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2011;49:949–60.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Deb AB, Kjærgaard N. Radio-over-fiber using an optical antenna based on Rydberg states of atoms. Appl Phys Lett. 2018;112:211106.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gallagher TF. Rydberg atoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sedlacek JA, Schwettmann A, Kübler H, Löw R, Pfau T, Shaffer JP. Microwave electrometry with Rydberg atoms in a vapour cell using bright atomic resonances. Nat Photonics. 2012;8:819–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tishchenko VA, Tokatly VI, Luk’yanov VI. The beginning of the metrology of radio frequency electromagnetic fields and the first standards of electric field strength. Meas Tech. 2003;46:76–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Holloway CL, Gordon JA, Jefferts S, Schwarzkopf A, Anderson DA, Miller SA et al.. Broadband Rydberg atom-based electric-field probe for SI-traceable, self-calibrated measurements. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2018;62:6169–82.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleischhauer M, Imamoglu A, Marangos JP. Electromagnetically induced transparency: optics in coherent media. Rev Mod Phys. 2005;77(2):633–73.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Holloway CL, Simons MT, Gordon JA, Dienstfrey A, Anderson DA, Raithel G. Electric field metrology for SI traceability: systematic measurement uncertainties in electromagnetically induced transparency in atomic vapor. J Appl Phys. 2017;121:233106.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang J, Han M, Zhao S, Cai Y, Jelezko F, Jia Z et al.. Optical PAM-4 generation via electromagnetically induced transparency in nitrogen-vacancy centers. Results Phys. 2021;30:104802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang S, Zhou S, Loy MMT, Wong GKL, Du S. Optical storage with electromagnetically induced transparency in a dense cold atomic ensemble. Opt Lett. 2011;36(23):4530–2.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Autler SH, Townes CH. Stark effect in rapidly varying fields. Phys Rev. 1955;100:703–22.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Salloum TYA. Electromagnetically induced transparency and Autle-Townes splitting: two similar but distinct phenomena in two categories of three-level atomic systems. Phys Rev A. 2010;81:053836.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. You S, Cai M, Zhang S, Xu Z, Liu H. Microwave-field sensing via electromagnetically induced absorption of rb irradiated by three-color infrared lasers. Opt Express. 2022;30(10):16619–29.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liao K, Tu H, Yang S, Chen C, Liu X, Liang J et al.. Microwave electrometry via electromagnetically induced absorption in cold Rydberg atoms. Phys Rev A. 2020;101:053432.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang A, Peng Y, Zhou W, Zhao S, Xu Y, Li Y. Microwave electric-field measurement with active Raman gain. J Opt Soc Am B. 2019;36(8):2134–9.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cai Y, Wang J, Lin L, Lu X, Li Y, Peng Y. Proposal of Rydberg atomic receiver for amplitude-modulated microwave signals with active Raman gain. Appl Opt. 2020;59(28):8612–7.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Simons MT, Gordon JA, Holloway CL, Anderson DA, Miller SA, Raithel G. Using frequency detuning to improve the sensitivity of electric field measurements via electromagnetically induced transparency and Autler–Townes splitting in Rydberg atoms. Appl Phys Lett. 2016;108:174101.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kumar S, Fan H, Kübler H, Sheng J, Shaffer JP. Atom-based sensing of weak radio frequency electric felds using homodyne readout. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42981.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Peng Y, Wang J, Yang A, Jia Z, Li D, Chen B. Cavity-enhanced microwave electric field measurement using Rydberg atoms. J Opt Soc Am B. 2018;35:2272–7.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Peng Y, Zhang Z, Wang X, Liu S, Yang A, Wang X. Frequency and intensity readouts of micro-wave electric field using Rydberg atoms with Doppler effects. Opt Quantum Electron. 2018;50:311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin L, He Y, Yin Z, Li D, Jia Z, Zhao Y et al.. Sensitive detection of radio-frequency field phase with interacting dark states in Rydberg atoms. Appl Opt. 2022;61:1427–33.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang A, Peng Y, Xu Y, Liang M. Dispersion readout of micro-wave electric field using double-dark-state Rydberg atoms. Laser Phys. 2019;29:045201.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Peng Y, Zhang Z, Wang J, Chen B, Zeng Q, Li Y. Tunable nonlinear measurement of microwave electric fields with a dressed-state analysis. Eur Phys J D. 2019;73:220.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu Z, Zhang L, Liu B, Zhang Z, Guo G, Ding D et al.. Deep learning enhanced Rydberg multifrequency microwave recognition. Nat Commun. 2022;13:1997.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ficek Z, Freedhoff HS. Resonance-auorescence and absorption spectra of a two-level atom driven by a strong bichromatic field. Phys Rev A. 1993;48:4530–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu Y, Wu Q, Lezama A, Gauthier DJ, Mossberg TW. Resonance fluorescence of two-level atoms under strong bichromatic excitation. Phys Rev A. 1990;41:6574(R).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Freedhoff H, Chen Z. Resonance fluorescence of a two-level atom in a strong bichromatic field. Phys Rev A. 1990;41:4530–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang J, Zhu Y, Jiang KJ, Zhan MS. Bichromatic electromagnetically induced transparency in cold rubidium atoms. Phys Rev A. 2003;68:063810.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Yan H, Liao K, Li J, Du Y, Zhang Z, Zhu S. Bichromatic electromagnetically induced transparency in hot rubidium atoms. Phys Rev A. 2013;87:055401.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang GQ, Xu P, Wang J, Zhu Y, Zhan MS. Four-wave mixing in a three-level bichromatic electromagnetically induced transparency system. Phys Rev A. 2010;82:045804.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Emil VD, Andreas K, Florian K, Marten R. Bichromatic four-wave mixing and quadrature-squeezing from biexcitons in atomically thin semiconductor microcavities. Phys Rev B. 2022;106:195307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Li Y, Zhang S, Wei J, Wei J, Ahmed I, Luo B et al.. Spatial and frequency dressed multimode of cascaded two spontaneous four-wave mixing. J Opt Soc Am B. 2023;40(4):721–9.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hu M, Qin Z, Che J, Zhang Y. Propagating multi-channel four-wave mixing process in the modulated moving photonic band gap. Opt Express. 2020;28:33448–55.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang J, Zhou H, Wang D, Zhu S. Enhanced reflection via phase compensation from anomalous dispersion in atomic vapor. Phys Rev A. 2011;83:053841.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou H, Wang D, Wang D, Zhang J, Zhu S. Efficient reflection via four-wave mixing in a Doppler-free electromagnetically-induced-transparency gas system. Phys Rev A. 2011;84:053835.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Han M, He Y, Li Q, Song X, Wang Y, Yang A et al.. Efficient optical isolator via dual-Raman process with chiral nonlinearity. Results Phys. 2023;46:106288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Li J, Yu R, Ding C, Wu Y. Optical bistability and four-wave mixing with a single nitrogen-vacancy center coupled to a photonic crystal nanocavity in the weak-coupling regime. Opt Express. 2014;22:15024–38.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Fanid AT, Rostami A. A proposal for optomechanical bichromatic wavelength switching for two-color up-conversion application. Opt Quantum Electron. 2022;54:532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jiang C, Cui Y, Bian X, Li X, Chen G. Control of microwave signals using bichromatic electromechanically induced transparency in multimode circuit electromechanical systems. Chin Phys B. 2016;25(5):054204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Deng L, Gain-Assisted PMG. Large and rapidly responding Kerr effect using a room-temperature active Raman gain medium. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;98:253902.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang J, Qi T, Pan X, Guo J, Zhu K, Liu X. Helicity of harmonic generation and attosecond polarization with bichromatic circularly polarized laser fields. Chin Phys B. 2019;28(10):103204.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Scully MO, Zubairy MS. Quantum optics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Shahriara MS, Wanga Y, Krishnamurthya S, Tua Y, Patic GS, Tsenga S. Evolution of an N-level system via automated vectorization of the Liouville equations and application to optically controlled polarization rotation. J Mod Opt. 2014;61(4):351–67.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. Yariv A. Quantum electronics. 3rd ed. Central Book Co.; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhu Y, Wu Q, Lezama A, Gauthier DJ, Mossberg TW. Resonance fluorescence of two-level atoms under strong bichromatic excitation. Phys Rev A. 1990;41:5374(R).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhou F, Jia F, Liu X, Yu Y, Mei J, Zhang J et al.. Improving the spectral resolution and measurement range of quantum microwave electrometry by cold Rydberg atoms. J Phys, B At Mol Opt Phys. 2023;56:025501.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Hao L, Xue Y, Fan J, Jiao Y, Zhao J, Jia S. Rydberg electromagnetically induced transparency and Autler–Townes splitting in a weak radio-frequency electric field. Chin Phys B. 2019;28(5):053202.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. Gordon JA, Simons MT, Haddab AH, Holloway CL. Weak electric-field detection with sub-1 Hz resolution at radio frequencies using a Rydberg atom-based mixer. AIP Adv. 2019;9(4):045030.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Smith DG. Rayleigh criterion. Field guide to physical optics. 2013.

  57. Zhang L, Jiang Y, Wan R, Tian S, Zhang B, Zhang X et al.. Extremely narrowed and amplified gain spectrum induced by the Doppler effect. J Phys, B At Mol Opt Phys. 2011;44:135505.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors appreciate the helpful discussion with Prof. Qingtian Zeng.


This work was supported by the Shandong Natural Science Foundation, China (No. ZR2021LLZ006), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Nos. 61675118, 61773245), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFA0701003), the Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province, China (No. ts20190936), the Shandong University of Science and Technology Research Fund, China (No. 2015TDJH102), and the Innovation and entrepreneurship training program for college students of Shandong Province (No. S202110424009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



M. Han conceived the idea and the schem, derived the theoretical framework and code, performed the calculations and wrote the manuscript. H. Hao conducted the experiment, and analysed data. X. Song contributed to reviewing and editing. Z. Yin , M. Parniak, Z. JIa contributed to reviewing and assessing the results. Y. Peng contributed throughout, supervised the research, and provided funding. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to He Hao or Yandong Peng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, M., Hao, H., Song, X. et al. Microwave electrometry with bichromatic electromagnetically induced transparency in Rydberg atoms. EPJ Quantum Technol. 10, 28 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: